Sports Stuff 4 Kids

Forcefield Protective Headbands

Another JC Display Productions web store
Phone 631-273-2310

ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE-WORK PRODUCT IMMUNIZED-PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

THIS IS PURSUENT TO MY PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONS AND IMPRESSIONS WITHOUT RECEIVING AND OR EVALUATING ALL DOCUMENTS

THE FOLLOWING IS SOME INFORMATION FOR FUTURE DISCUSSIONS

Calibrated headform without headband and just the helmet 147.95 gs.
ForceField headband placed inside helmet-forehead impact-108.89 gs    
26.4% absorption of forces
Brain Pad headband placed inside helmet-forehead impact-138.67
6.2% absorption of forces
(This result is no different than placing a Nike sweatband in the helmet) see below
This result refutes the manufacturer’s claim that it reduces the forcs on impact when placed in a helmet.

At 2 feet drop, 3.54 meters/second velocity; headform only on a MEP pad,
Shore A durometer hardness-calibrated at 285.16 gs
ForceField headband        201.61gs   29% absorption of forces 
Brain Pad headband         227.05       20% absorption of forces

At 18” drop, 3.02 meters/second, ; headform only on a MEP pad,
Shore A durometer hardness-calibrated at 235.84 gs
ForceField headband        157.71       33% absorption of forces
 Brain Pad headband          181.15      23% absorption of forces

At 12” drop, 2.45 meters/second; headform only on a MEP pad,
Shore A durometer hardness-calibrated at 183.59gs
ForceField headband          108.89        40.7% absorption of forces
 Brain Pad headband          129.99      29% absorption of forces

Conclusions
            
1. The Brain Pad does not absorb 50% of the impact forces
            
2. The Brain Pad is useless in conjunction with a helmet.
  The  in the type of polymer in the ForceField headband was the cause of the lowering of those values. The material we originally selected for the headbands was  1/4 inch thick 6 lb. density Vinyl Nitrile. The product is made by the DERTEX Corporation in Boston.
  The tests documented above are more severe than what a young soccer player would experience in a soccer match. What it does prove is that no matter what level of force was applied, the Brain Pad headband was significantly lower than the ForceField headband in performance at all levels.
  Therefore, if the test forces were low enough (McGill University testing) at the point that the ForceField headband absorbed and dissipated 50+% of the forces.
  At the same testing levels, the Brain Pad headband would have values well below the 50% level. The Brain Pad is a blatant infringement on all of our headband patents.
  The tests performed at McGill University documented the 50-80% absorption and dissipation of forces for the ForceField headband.

Continue: