|
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE-WORK PRODUCT IMMUNIZED-PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
THIS IS PURSUENT TO MY PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONS AND IMPRESSIONS WITHOUT RECEIVING AND OR EVALUATING ALL DOCUMENTS
THE FOLLOWING IS SOME INFORMATION FOR FUTURE DISCUSSIONS
Calibrated headform without headband and just the helmet 147.95 gs. ForceField headband placed inside helmet-forehead impact-108.89 gs 26.4% absorption of forces Brain Pad headband placed inside helmet-forehead impact-138.67 6.2% absorption of forces (This result is no different than placing a Nike sweatband in the helmet) see below This result refutes the manufacturer’s claim that it reduces the forcs on impact when placed in a helmet.
At 2 feet drop, 3.54 meters/second velocity; headform only on a MEP pad, Shore A durometer hardness-calibrated at 285.16 gs ForceField headband 201.61gs 29% absorption of forces Brain Pad headband 227.05 20% absorption of forces
At 18” drop, 3.02 meters/second, ; headform only on a MEP pad, Shore A durometer hardness-calibrated at 235.84 gs ForceField headband 157.71 33% absorption of forces Brain Pad headband 181.15 23% absorption of forces
At 12” drop, 2.45 meters/second; headform only on a MEP pad, Shore A durometer hardness-calibrated at 183.59gs ForceField headband 108.89 40.7% absorption of forces Brain Pad headband 129.99 29% absorption of forces
Conclusions 1. The Brain Pad does not absorb 50% of the impact forces 2. The Brain Pad is useless in conjunction with a helmet. The in the type of polymer in the ForceField headband was the cause of the lowering of those values. The material we originally selected for the headbands was 1/4 inch thick 6 lb. density Vinyl Nitrile. The product is made by the DERTEX Corporation in Boston. The tests documented above are more severe than what a young soccer player would experience in a soccer match. What it does prove is that no matter what level of force was applied, the Brain Pad headband was significantly lower than the ForceField headband in performance at all levels. Therefore, if the test forces were low enough (McGill University testing) at the point that the ForceField headband absorbed and dissipated 50+% of the forces. At the same testing levels, the Brain Pad headband would have values well below the 50% level. The Brain Pad is a blatant infringement on all of our headband patents. The tests performed at McGill University documented the 50-80% absorption and dissipation of forces for the ForceField headband.
|